I have the 264 cams and a Garret chip. I had the chip before the cams so I
figured I would get upgraded rather than shell out for a new one, I think
the programming was similar to that of a 276 cam IIRC.
Honestly, I don't think it is that good of a combo. I have gone head to head
with several chipped VR6's that I was even with before the cams, and I am
still even with them now. I think I would notice 22 hp.
I think I am going to get the AMS chip for them to see if it makes a
From: Ian Pitts [mailto:Ian_Pitts@g1<img src=/i/dc.gif border=0 width=35 height=15>]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 11:32 AM
I just read a great review on the Kent 264º cams for the VR6. Here's the
They dyno'd it at +22HP with no loss in low-end torque. Can't beat that
price:performance ratio at only $399!
I wonder if Garrett has a VR6 chip for these cams yet? Maybe I should get
and have him use me as a guinnea pig.
'93 Passat GLX
For info on: how to subscribe & unsubscribe, the list's tech/how-to
library, etc. see: http://www.panix.com/~aqn/GTI_VR6/gti_vr6_list/